Interpreting has no other unity than a transversal one; interpreting alone s the divinity of which each thing is a fragment, but its “divine form” neither collects nor unites the fragments, it carries them on the contrary to the highest, most acute state, preventing them from forming a whole. The “subject” of the Search in finally no self, it is that we with out content that portion out Swann, the narrator, and Charlus, distributes or selects them without totalizling them.

Cells and Vessels, Proust and signes, p.128, Delezue

It is no longer a matter of saying: to create is to remember – but rather, to remember is to create, is to reach that point where the associative chain breaks, leaps over the constituted individual, is transferred to the brith of an individuation world. And it is no longer a matter of saying: to create is to think – but rather, to think is to create and primarily to create the act of thinking within thought. To think, then, is to provide food for thought. To remember is to create, not to create memory, but to create the spiritual equivalent of the still too material memory, to create the viewpoint valid for all association, the style valid for all images. It is style that substitutes for experience the manner in which we speak about it or the formula that expresses it, which substitutes for the individual in the world the viewpoint toward a world, and which transforms reminiscence into a realized creation.

Antilogos, Proust and signes, p.111, Deleuze